<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Which is Better?  SEO or Quality Content?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.kcjmarketing.com/which-is-better-seo-or-quality-content/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.kcjmarketing.com/which-is-better-seo-or-quality-content/</link>
	<description>The Internet for the Rest of Us</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: More Help With SEO</title>
		<link>http://blog.kcjmarketing.com/which-is-better-seo-or-quality-content/#comment-91</link>
		<dc:creator>More Help With SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 15:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kcjmarketing.com/?p=18#comment-91</guid>
		<description>[...] DIGG_URL=='string'?DIGG_URL:window.location.href); document.write(""); } )()  A while back, I wrote a post about how important content is, and how you cannot sacrifice content for the sake of SEO. Well, we should all learn that you [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] DIGG_URL==&#8217;string&#8217;?DIGG_URL:window.location.href); document.write(&#8221;"); } )()  A while back, I wrote a post about how important content is, and how you cannot sacrifice content for the sake of SEO. Well, we should all learn that you [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Wilson</title>
		<link>http://blog.kcjmarketing.com/which-is-better-seo-or-quality-content/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 05:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kcjmarketing.com/?p=18#comment-61</guid>
		<description>If you go for just SEO you will, for the most part, lose out on content just because you are not writing for content anymore, you are writing for keywords. If you write quality content you will get quality visitors which will benefit you more in the end anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you go for just SEO you will, for the most part, lose out on content just because you are not writing for content anymore, you are writing for keywords. If you write quality content you will get quality visitors which will benefit you more in the end anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joy</title>
		<link>http://blog.kcjmarketing.com/which-is-better-seo-or-quality-content/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Joy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 07:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.kcjmarketing.com/?p=18#comment-27</guid>
		<description>I agree with you, SEO can get out of hand and overshadow the value of good content.  I work with a client who hired an SEO to write articles, but the articles don't make sense and are annoying to read. The client finally decided to get rid of that contractor because they couldn't agree upon which should take priority.  The owner of the company simply cannot stand to be associated with such bad writing for the sake of SEO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you, SEO can get out of hand and overshadow the value of good content.  I work with a client who hired an SEO to write articles, but the articles don&#8217;t make sense and are annoying to read. The client finally decided to get rid of that contractor because they couldn&#8217;t agree upon which should take priority.  The owner of the company simply cannot stand to be associated with such bad writing for the sake of SEO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
